Five entire months have gone since the guard group for Silk Road maker Ross Ulbricht propelled their intrigue for another preliminary. That 170-page contention speaks to Ulbricht’s last any expectation of getting away from lifelong incarceration subsequent to being sentenced for running an intrigue to deal with drugs, launder cash, and sell PC hacking apparatuses. Presently the arraignment has reacted with its own, similarly gigantic record disproving those contentions individually, an endeavor to put the last seal on the destiny of the man behind the dark web’s most famous bootleg market.
In a 186-page brief recorded Friday evening, the investigators go over quite a bit of Ulbricht’s 11-day preliminary early a year ago and safeguard rehashed choices by Judge Katherine Forrest in the indictment’s kindness—a progression of moves to stifle barrier proof, deny protection witnesses, and concede arraignment proof that drove Ulbricht’s lawyers to require a legal blunder no under multiple times. In any case, maybe the most outstanding answer concerns the discussion over the job of two degenerate government specialists who utilized their jobs in the examination to blackmail and take cash from the Silk Road, and whose contribution was kept totally mystery from the jury—and somewhat even from Ulbricht’s guard—during his preliminary.
Here are the indictment’s most significant contentions.
Contention: Criminal Feds Are Irrelevant
As the barrier sketched out in its allure, DEA specialist Carl Mark Force and Secret Service operator Shaun Bridges both manhandled their entrance to the Silk Road in madly shocking manners: Bridges utilized a witness’ record to take $800,000 in bitcoins from the site, while Force endeavored to extort Ulbricht utilizing one nom de plume selling him law implementation data utilizing another. The resistance has contended that it wasn’t told about the full degree of Force’s trouble-making until the preliminary closed, and wasn’t told about Bridges’ job by any means.
In any case, in its most recent rejoinder, the indictment contends that any revelations it ought to have made are unessential in light of the fact that Force’s and Bridges’ conduct has nothing to do with discrediting Ulbricht’s blame. “Ulbricht’s intrigue dependent on the debasement of two Baltimore operators comes up short for the straightforward explanation that, even now, Ulbricht has not clarified how the data he tried to force or concede was exculpatory,” the concise peruses. “No place does Ulbricht clarify how Force’s and Bridge’s wrongdoings reprimand the Government’s ‘staggering’ verification.”
The short focuses to the indictment’s clothing rundown of ground-breaking proof against Ulbricht that it contends have no connection to the degenerate specialists. That cursing proof incorporates a logbook and diary found on his PC, records of exchanges on bitcoin’s open record known as the blockchain that follows $18 million in bitcoins sent from the Silk Road servers to that PC, and FBI specialists’ getting Ulbricht “in the act” in a San Francisco library, signed into the Silk Road as its top head, in any event, getting to an alleged “plan” page. Legal counselors for Ulbricht’s protection declined to remark on the arraignment’s reply.
I think after hearing all of this you’re maybe looking to visit the dark web directly and If you really are then you’ll need real dark web sites and dark web links and then you can easily visit the dark web with tor browser and you can know more about this damn dark web, why it is so bad, why peoples and all the world always very scary about the dark web.
Contention: Evidence Could Not Be Planted
The barrier has contended that Bridges or Force could have utilized their illicit access to the Silk Road to alter its records or even in some way or another plant proof on his PC. In any case, in its reaction, the arraignment calls attention to that the Silk Road staff account that Secret Service specialist Bridges captured from a witness didn’t really have the “root” get to fundamental for that caring altering. Furthermore, it additionally contends that the barrier thought about DEA operator Force’s wrongdoings to the extent that on the off chance that it had associated some sort with proof planting on Ulbricht’s PC, it could have attempted to demonstrate that treachery at preliminary. (Truth be told, Ulbricht’s barrier made contentions that proof could have been planted on his PC by means of a BitTorrent association, which the indictment appeared to persuade the jury were fake. “There were no little mythical beings that put that proof on [Ulbricht’s] PC,” examiner Serrin Turner said in his end contention.)
Contention: Defense Actually Shows More Guilt
Most damningly, the arraignment contends, Force’s activities show Ulbricht to be considerably progressively liable, as they exhibit that Ulbricht, at that point utilizing the nom de plume “Fear Pirate Roberts” or “DPR,” was utilizing Force as a mole, paying for inside data on the continuous examination against him. “In the event that anything, Force’s endeavors to offer data to ‘DPR’ or in any case coerce him were ‘inculpatory as [they] suggest[ed] that Ulbricht, as ‘DPR,’ was trying to pay law authorization for inside data to ensure his unlawful venture,'” the concise peruses.
Contention: In Defense of the Judge
The job of the degenerate specialists is just one bit of Ulbricht’s crusade for another preliminary, and the arraignment brief proceeds to disprove its different focuses, as well: It contends that warrants to seize and look through Ulbricht’s advanced records on the web and on his PC were fittingly restricted and that the appointed authority for the situation was right to block the protection’s interrogation of a DHS operator, planned for bringing out proof proposing bitcoin business person Mark Karpeles could be a substitute suspect in the quest for Silk Road’s director. (That proof was flimsy, and immediately excused by the Silk Road’s specialists.) And it guards the appointed authority’s choice to hinder the safeguard from calling two a minute ago master observers, calling that strategy “preliminary by the trap.”
Contention: A Life Sentence Is Appropriate
At last, the short finishes by tending to Ulbricht’s questionable life sentence. The safeguard contended that existence without any chance to appeal was out of line, in light of deceptive cases that Ulbricht was straightforwardly answerable for Silk Road purchasers who kicked the bucket from tranquilizing overdoses because of substances they purchased on his bootleg market. The barrier additionally contended that the discouragement impact Judge Forrest looked for against future dark web business people didn’t necessitate that extraordinary sentence, composing that the discipline “stuns the inner voice.”
It’s important that the indictment, during the preliminary, never really looked for lifelong incarceration. Rather, investigators proposed a sentence “significantly over the obligatory least” of 20 years. Be that as it may, in Friday’s concise, it completely backs the appointed authority’s cruel principle.
The indictment focuses on condemning rules that show Ulbricht was completely qualified for life in jail. What’s more, it contends that Ulbricht was legitimately answerable for the individuals who kicked the bucket from overdoses because of the Silk Road’s deals. “In the Government’s view, Ulbricht was the boss of a worldwide medication dealing undertaking who was answerable for the entirety of the predictable results of his activities, including the numerous passings attached to tranquilize deals on Silk Road,” the concise peruses. “Ulbricht knew, and in some cases ridiculed the reality, that his clients were frequently addicts attempting to stop, and he took their cash, no different.”