No comments found - why not add yours now!
It’s 2010. Copenhagen has come and gone, and the green issue hangs ever more incumbent over the policies of our world’s leaders. In our time of globalisation, increased air travel and higher gas-guzzling, plans to reduce carbon footprints may well seem powerless to halt the destruction of our contemporary lifestyles. Widespread families will continue to travel the vast distances to visit expatriate relatives living out in Australia. Couples with kids and a bit of cash on them will continue to jet off to the latest exotic destination on summer breaks. And who’s to deny them the spoils of a technologically advanced and global society?
Certainly not television. Since the likes of Michael Palin’s Around the World in 80 Days, foreign travel has not only looked attractive, it’s been outright encouraged. A tradition of travel programmes such as BBC’s Holiday and ITV’s Wish You Were Here…? have made their mark on British screens, seducing the public with picturesque visions of palm beaches off the Hawaiian coast and luxurious shopping exploits in Dubai. Even for holidaymakers on string-tight budgets, advice and enthusiasm from such programmes encourage viewers to chew up the scenery in places ranging from St. Lucia to Singapore. If you want to do it, do it, is the motto from our presenters – more recently, Channel 4’s popular Indian Winter season started again on 20th January, with a special series of reports and features from across India.
Yet, what real cost to the planet does such mass travelling entail? Is it right that televisi
Sky One’s Long Way Round, which narrates a series of motorcycle escapades from London to New York, kept audiences glued to their seats during its 2004-2005 run – and that wasn’t for its presenter’s Hollywood credentials. The incredulous exploits of the boys in such far reaching lands as Mongolia and the Russian Steppe, provided a window onto another land, another culture, rarely, if ever, experienced by the average Brit. Although the smells and tastes of Latvian cuisine weren’t forthcoming, sympathetic participation with the presenters, coupled with the sights and sounds captured by camera, allowed for a truly immersive experience – or at least the closest one can get – on the wrong side of the Channel. If anything else, for those unable to travel conventionally, it was a cheap and more environmentally friendly alternative!
With globalisation allowing crews to push into even more remote corners of the world, the range of travel documentaries have become even more daring in scope – check out BBC Tribe’s Bruce Parry tripping out on iboga, a hallucinogen, native to western Central Africa in an initiation ceremony of the Sanema people. Yet more fascinating footage, no doubt, waits to be filmed. In days to come, one looking atavistically might welcome such an archive. Let’s imagine, if you will, a future wherein we have exhausted our fossil fuel supplies. International travel has become scarce, if not ceased altogether. People are once more isolated within small land-locked communities. Yet a global society still exists through the means of the internet - a virtual network of social hubbub and communication. A need for travel – for mutual cultural recognition and understanding remains as necessary and relevant, if not more so, than in our present day. Whereas in our age, television encourages tourism, perhaps in decades to come, it will serve as the sole means of experiencing the wonders of the world through a ‘virtual’ tourism. It may also serve as a necessary filmic reminder of a world and cultures we have lost.
This article was written by Annabelle Hawes and was uploaded at 4:37am, Friday 5th February 2010.
It was posted in LS2 » TV » Travel Documentaries - leading the way to a necessary future in virtual tourism?